Skip to content

National Institutes of Health v. American Public Health Association

Emergency application for stay of district court judgments is granted in part and denied in part. Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson would deny in full. Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh would grant in full.

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
25a103 Not Argued Aug 21, 2025 TBD N/A OT 2025

Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should stay district court judgments blocking the National Institutes of Health from terminating grants

Judgment: Emergency application for stay is granted in part and denied in part on August 21, 2025. Justice Barrett filed a concurring opinion. Chief Justice Roberts filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, joined by Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson. Justice Gorsuch filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, joined by Justice Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. Jackson filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
07/24/2025Application (25A103) for a stay, submitted to Justice Jackson.
07/25/2025Response to application (25A103) requested by Justice Jackson, due by 4p.m. (EDT) on August 1, 2025.
08/01/2025Response to application from respondents Massachusetts, et al. filed.
08/01/2025Response to application from respondents American Public Health Association, et al. filed.
08/01/2025Brief amicus curiae of The Association of American Medical Colleges, et al. filed.
08/01/2025Brief amicus curiae of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, American Society for Microbiology, American Society for Cell Biology filed.
08/04/2025Reply of applicant National Institutes of Health, et al. filed.
08/21/2025Application (25A103) referred to the Court.
08/21/2025Application (25A103) for stay presented to Justice Jackson and by her referred to the Court is granted in part and denied in part. The application is granted as to the District Court’s judgments vacating the Government’s termination of various research-related grants. See Department of Ed. v. California, 604 U. S. ___ (2025) (per curiam). [See Detached Opinion for full order language] The application is otherwise denied. Paragraphs 3 and 4 of the June 23, 2025 order of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, case No. 1:25–cv–10787, and paragraph II of the June 23, 2025 order of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, case No. 1:25–cv–10814, are stayed pending the disposition of the appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, if such a writ is timely sought. Should certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the issuance of the judgment of the Court. The Government may raise its arguments as to the remainder of the District Court’s judgments in the ordinary course. The Chief Justice, Justice Sotomayor, Justice Kagan, and Justice Jackson would deny the application in full. Justice Thomas, Justice Alito, Justice Gorsuch, and Justice Kavanaugh would grant the application in full.