|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-8801||Okla. Crim. App.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether the boundaries established in the Treaty of February 23, 1867, for the eight tribes within the former Indian Territory of northeastern Oklahoma constitute an "Indian reservation" today under 18 U.S.C § 1151(a).
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Apr 04 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 13, 2019)|
|May 29 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019.|
|Jun 04 2019||Response Requested. (Due July 5, 2019)|
|Jun 13 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 5, 2019 to August 5, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jun 19 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 5, 2019.|
|Aug 05 2019||Brief of respondent Oklahoma in opposition filed.|
|Aug 22 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.|
|Oct 07 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.|
|Oct 15 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.|
|Oct 25 2019||Reply of petitioner Patrick Joseph Terry filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 28 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.|
|Nov 04 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.|
|Nov 12 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.|
|Nov 18 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2019.|
|Dec 02 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.|
|Dec 09 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.|
|Jul 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/8/2020.|
|Jul 09 2020||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of McGirt v. Oklahoma, 591 U. S. ___ (2020).|
|Aug 10 2020||MANDATE ISSUED.|
|Aug 10 2020||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
In clash between private property rights and pro-union interests, the Supreme Court invalidates a California regulation that requires agricultural employers to allow union organizers onto their property to speak with workers. SCOTUS says the regulation violates the 5th Amendment.
BREAKING: In major First Amendment case on student speech, the Supreme Court rules 8-1 in favor of a former high school student who was disciplined by her public school after sending a vulgar message on Snapchat complaining about the school's cheerleading squad.
In the second Supreme Court opinion of the day, the court holds that the structure of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (which regulates Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac) is unconstitutional because of the limits on the president's ability to remove the agency's director.
The Supreme Court issues its opinion in the "hot pursuit" case -- a case about when police can follow a fleeing suspect into a home without a warrant. In an opinion by Kagan, the court declines to adopt a bright-line rule on "hot pursuits" of people suspected of misdemeanors.
The Supreme Court will release one or more opinions at 10:00 a.m. Join us on the live blog beginning at 9:45. https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/06/announcement-of-opinions-for-wednesday-june-23/
After the Supreme Court handed down three opinions this morning, 12 cases remain outstanding for this term. They include voting rights, student free speech, and anonymous donors. We expect more opinions on Wednesday, June 23 at 10:00 a.m. ET.
We will open the live blog at 9:45.
Experts continue to analyze last week's Fulton decision. Here are the final pieces in our symposium.
Thomas Berg & Douglas Laycock on the future of free-exercise challenges: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/06/protecting-free-exercise-under-smith-and-after-smith/
Holly Hollman on the ruling's many unresolved questions: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/06/court-requires-religious-exemption-but-leaves-many-questions-unanswered/
The first two pieces in our symposium on yesterday's decision in Fulton v. Philadelphia are up. First, @JimOleske dissects the decision in light of the court's shadow-docket ruling in Tandon v. Newsom, which took a very different approach to free exercise.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.