|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|16-1468||9th Cir.||Not Argued||Nov 6, 2017||n/a||Per Curiam||OT 2017|
Holding: The U.S. Court of Appeals erred when it held that “federal law” as interpreted by the Supreme Court “clearly” establishes that specific performance of the lower sentence that the parties had originally expected is constitutionally required.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded in a per curiam opinion on November 6, 2017.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 06 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 10, 2017)|
|Jul 06 2017||Brief of respondent Michael Daniel Cuero in opposition filed.|
|Jul 06 2017||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Michael Daniel Cuero.|
|Jul 24 2017||Reply of petitioner Scott Kernan, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation filed.|
|Jul 26 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 25, 2017.|
|Sep 05 2017||Record Requested.|
|Sep 05 2017||Record received from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit. The record is electronic.|
|Oct 02 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2017.|
|Oct 10 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/13/2017.|
|Oct 23 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2017.|
|Oct 30 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/3/2017.|
|Nov 06 2017||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.|
|Nov 06 2017||Petition for certiorari GRANTED, Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion).|
|Nov 15 2017||Petition for Rehearing filed.|
|Nov 29 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2018.|
|Jan 08 2018||Rehearing DENIED.|
|Jan 09 2018||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Wait wut.. RBG ghost-wrote the equal protection bits of Obergefell?!
And I learned this on @SCOTUSblog’s TikTok?! https://www.tiktok.com/@scotusblog/video/6922179577724931333
"This is not our first commission rodeo” says Levy. 😉
Love this write up of the @BrookingsInst's panel yesterday with @Susan_Hennessey, @danepps,@cdkang76, and @mollyereynolds.
Thanks, @SCOTUSblog and Kalvis Golde!
Spilling SCOTUS tea on TikTok today. Well, actually, @eskridgebill spilled the tea, we just tok’d about it. 🍵
The Supreme Court got rid of several cases this morning -- in one fell swoop. Read @AHoweBlogger's latest coverage of the emoluments cases, spiritual advisers at Texas executions, Texas abortion policies, COVID restrictions, and NY political corruption.
Justices vacate rulings on Trump and emoluments - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday morning released orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Jan. 22. The justices once again did not ac...
In this morning's orders list, SCOTUS took no action on pending cert petitions involving:
- Mississippi's near-ban on abortions after 15 weeks,
- a Trump rule banning Title X clinics from providing abortion referrals,
- the Trump administration's "public charge" immigration rule.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.