|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-7496||6th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2018|
Issue: Whether the Taylor v. United States definition of generic burglary in the Armed Career Criminal Act extends to burglary statutes that do not require an intent to commit a further crime at the time of entry, as held by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit and the court below, or whether it only encompasses burglary statutes that require such intent at the time of entry, as held by the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 5th and 8th Circuits.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 17 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 20, 2018)|
|Feb 13 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 20, 2018 to March 22, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Feb 14 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 22, 2018.|
|Mar 05 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 22, 2018 to April 23, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 06 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 23, 2018.|
|Apr 18 2018||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|May 02 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/17/2018.|
|May 03 2018||Reply of petitioner Shannon L. Ferguson filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 20 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.|
|Jan 07 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.|
|Jun 10 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019.|
|Jun 12 2019||Supplemental Brief of Shannon L. Ferguson not accepted for filing. (June 12, 2019 - Corrected version to be submitted).|
|Jun 12 2019||Supplemental brief of petitioner Shannon L. Ferguson filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 17 2019||Petition DENIED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.