|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|11-597||Fed. Cir.||Oct 3, 2012||Dec 4, 2012||8-0||Ginsburg||OT 2012|
Holding: Recurrent flooding that is induced by the government and temporary in duration is not automatically exempt from liability under the Takings Clause. (Kagan, J., recused.)
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 8-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on December 4, 2012.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 9 2011||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 16, 2011)|
|Dec 6 2011||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 17, 2012.|
|Dec 9 2011||Brief amici curiae of National Association of Home Builders, et al. filed.|
|Dec 15 2011||Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, and Cato Institute filed.|
|Dec 15 2011||Brief amici curiae of Arkansas, et al. filed.|
|Dec 16 2011||Brief amicus curiae of Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies filed.|
|Jan 13 2012||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including March 1, 2012.|
|Mar 1 2012||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Mar 8 2012||Reply of petitioner Arkansas Game & Fish Commission filed.|
|Mar 14 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 30, 2012.|
|Apr 2 2012||Petition GRANTED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.|
|Apr 23 2012||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from the counsel for the respondent.|
|May 7 2012||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including June 22, 2012.|
|May 7 2012||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 24, 2012.|
|Jun 18 2012||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is further extended to and including June 27, 2012.|
|Jun 18 2012||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is further extended to and including August 27, 2012.|
|Jun 27 2012||Joint appendix filed. (Joint appendix in 3 volumes). (Statement of costs filed)|
|Jun 27 2012||Brief of petitioner Arkansas Game & Fish Commission filed.|
|Jul 3 2012||Brief amici curiae of National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center, et al. filed.|
|Jul 3 2012||Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, et al. filed.|
|Jul 5 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Owners' Counsel of America filed.|
|Jul 5 2012||Brief amici curiae of Wolfsen Land & Cattle Co., et al. filed.|
|Jul 5 2012||Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation, et al. filed.|
|Jul 13 2012||CIRCULATED.|
|Jul 23 2012||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, October 3, 2012|
|Jul 31 2012||Record received from U.S.C.A. for Federal Circuit. (1 box)|
|Aug 27 2012||Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 29 2012||Record from U.S. Court of Federal Claims is electronic.|
|Aug 30 2012||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by professors of law teaching in the property law and water rights fields.|
|Sep 4 2012||Brief amici curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association, et al. filed.|
|Sep 19 2012||Reply of petitioner Arkansas Game & Fish Commission filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 25 2012||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by professors of law teaching in the property law and water rights fields GRANTED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.|
|Oct 3 2012||Argued. For petitioner: James F. Goodhart, Little Rock, Ark. For respondent: Edwin S. Kneedler, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Dec 4 2012||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which all other Members joined, except Kagan, J., who took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.|
|Jan 7 2013||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Jul 5 2013||Record returned to U.S.C.A. for Federal Circuit.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.