Breaking News

Author: Jayesh Rathod

Jayesh Rathod

Contributor

Jayesh Rathod is a professor of law, associate dean for experiential education and director of the Immigrant Justice Clinic at American University Washington College of Law.

Email Jayesh

Opinion analysis

Unusual alliance of justices holds government to strict notice requirement in removal proceedings

By Jayesh Rathod on May 2, 2021 at 3:58 pm

Breaking News

Court rules against government on technical question of notice requirement in immigration law

By Jayesh Rathod on Apr 29, 2021 at 10:43 am

Argument analysis: Justices revisit immigration notice provision, parsing statutory text while urging practical solutions

By Jayesh Rathod on Nov 10, 2020 at 10:52 pm

Case preview: How must the government serve notice of removal proceedings?

By Jayesh Rathod on Nov 6, 2020 at 4:22 pm

Opinion analysis: Divided court upholds restrictive reading of immigration statute, limiting relief to noncitizens facing removal

By Jayesh Rathod on Apr 24, 2020 at 9:12 am

Argument analysis: Justices examine structure and purpose of puzzling immigration statute

By Jayesh Rathod on Nov 6, 2019 at 9:25 am

Argument preview: Can a noncitizen be “inadmissible” if they are not seeking admission to the U.S.?

By Jayesh Rathod on Oct 28, 2019 at 9:54 am

Featured Posts

Slide 1

Supreme Court to hear Trump’s bid for criminal immunity

Slide 2

Ghost guns, six-person juries, and discretionary visa decisions

Slide 3

Justices divided over Jan. 6 participant’s call to throw out obstruction charge

Slide 4

Breaking News

Author: Jayesh Rathod

Jayesh Rathod

Opinion analysis

Unusual alliance of justices holds government to strict notice requirement in removal proceedings

Breaking News

Court rules against government on technical question of notice requirement in immigration law

Argument analysis: Justices revisit immigration notice provision, parsing statutory text while urging practical solutions

Case preview: How must the government serve notice of removal proceedings?

Opinion analysis: Divided court upholds restrictive reading of immigration statute, limiting relief to noncitizens facing removal

Argument analysis: Justices examine structure and purpose of puzzling immigration statute

Argument preview: Can a noncitizen be “inadmissible” if they are not seeking admission to the U.S.?

Featured Posts

Supreme Court to hear Trump’s bid for criminal immunity

Ghost guns, six-person juries, and discretionary visa decisions

Justices divided over Jan. 6 participant’s call to throw out obstruction charge

Justices limit securities liability for omission of material facts

Archives