Skip to content

Monday round-up

By

Briefly:

  • Mark Sherman of the Associated Press (via TheĀ Washington Post) examines the diversity of the Supreme Court bar, noting that “[i]n an era when three women, a Hispanic and an African-American sit on the court and white men constitute a bare majority of the nine justices, the court is more diverse than the lawyers who argue before it.”
  • UPI’s Michael Kirkland discusses retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s recent remarks to theĀ Chicago Tribune, in which she expressed doubts about the Court’s cert. grant inĀ Bush v. Gore; KirklandĀ observes that the “ultimate irony” is that even if the Court had not taken the case, “the odds are good [that] then-Texas Gov. George W.Ā Bush still would have won the presidency.” [Disclosure: The law firm of Thomas C. Goldstein, P.C., now known as Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to respondent Al Gore in that case.]
  • With the Court’s decision inĀ Shelby County v. Holder, the challenge to the constitutionality of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, expected in the next six weeks, Roger Clegg argues in theĀ National Review Online that the information recently released by the Census Bureau about voter turnout in 2012 “further undermines the constitutionality of the distinctions made by Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act between the jurisdictions it covers and those it does not.”Ā [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., is among the counsel to Representative F. James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed anĀ amicusĀ brief in support of the respondent in this case.]
  • At theĀ Constitutional Accountability Center, David Gans responds to Clegg’s post, countering that “the Voting Rights Act is not simply about increasing African American voter turnout, but about preventing all forms of voting discrimination.”
  • David Savage of theĀ Los Angeles TimesĀ reports Elmbrook School District v. Doe, one of the petitions considered at last week’s Conference, which asks the Court to decide whether a public high school violates the Establishment Clause when it holds its graduation ceremony in a local church.
  • AtĀ Minding the Campus, Roger Clegg urges the Justices – in light of their upcoming decision inĀ Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin – to take note of a recentĀ article in The New York TimesĀ which reports that whenĀ racial preferences were abolished forĀ university admissionsĀ in California, the state was forced to make reforms that helped disadvantaged students of all racial and ethnic groups. [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., represented the American Association of Law Schools as anĀ amicusĀ in this case.]

If you have (or know of) a recent article or post that you would like to have included in the round-up, please send a link toĀ roundup [at] scotusblog.comĀ so that we can consider it.

Recommended Citation: Marissa Miller, Monday round-up, SCOTUSblog (May. 13, 2013, 12:00 AM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2013/05/monday-round-up-169/