|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-755||7th Cir||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2013|
Issue: (1) Whether the Establishment Clause prohibits the government from conducting public functions such as high school graduation exercises in a church building, where the function has no religious content and the government selected the venue for reasons of secular convenience; (2) whether the government “coerces” religious activity in violation of Lee v. Weisman and Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe where there is no pressure to engage in a religious practice or activity, but merely exposure to religious symbols; and (3) whether the government “endorses” religion when it engages in a religion-neutral action that incidentally exposes citizens to a private religious message.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 4 2012||Application (12A329) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 21, 2012 to December 20, 2012, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Oct 4 2012||Application (12A329) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until December 20, 2012.|
|Dec 20 2012||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 22, 2013)|
|Jan 9 2013||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including February 21, 2013.|
|Jan 17 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus cuirae briefs, in support of either party or of neitiher party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Jan 17 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents.|
|Jan 18 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Alliance Defending Freedom filed.|
|Jan 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed.|
|Jan 22 2013||Brief amici curiae of Texas, et al. filed.|
|Jan 22 2013||Brief amici curiae of American Association of School Administratiors, et al. filed.|
|Feb 21 2013||Brief of respondents John Doe, 3, a Minor by Doe 3's Next Best Friend Doe 2, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Mar 6 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 22, 2013.|
|Mar 6 2013||Reply of petitioner Elmbrook School District filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 25 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 29, 2013.|
|Apr 1 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 12, 2013.|
|Apr 15 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 19, 2013.|
|Apr 22 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 26, 2013.|
|Apr 29 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 9, 2013.|
|May 13 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 16, 2013.|
|May 5 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 15, 2014.|
|May 6 2014||Supplemental brief of petitioner Elmbrook School District filed. (Distributed)|
|May 7 2014||Supplemental brief of respondents John Doe, 3, a Minor by Doe 3's Next Best Friend Doe 2, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|May 19 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 22, 2014.|
|May 27 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 29, 2014.|
|Jun 2 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 5, 2014.|
|Jun 9 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 12, 2014.|
|Jun 16 2014||Petition DENIED. Justice Scalia, with whom Justice Thomas joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)|
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.