Exide Technologies v. EnerSys Delaware, Inc.Petition for certiorari denied on February 22, 2011
|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|10-422||3d Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2010|
Issue: Whether a contract that imposes continuing obligations on both parties, and which includes obligations that are burdensome and disadvantageous to the estate, is an "executory contract" subject to rejection under section 365(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.
Plain English Summary:
- Petition of the day (Conor McEvily)