8 articles
Jonathan H. Adler is the inaugural Johan Verheij Memorial Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Business Law and Regulation at the Case Western Reserve University School of Law. His book, Business and the Roberts Court, is forthcoming this summer from Oxford University Press.
Zachary Price is an Associate Professor at UC Hastings College of the Law. The Supreme Court’s four-four affirmance in United States v. Texas may mean that the legal battle over immigration will go on.
Ernest A. Young holds the Alston & Bird Chair at Duke Law School. It’s safe to say that the Supreme Court’s one-line per curiam opinion today in United States v. Texas – “[t]he judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court” – will not go down in history as one of the Court’s landmark opinions.
Ilya Shapiro is a senior fellow in constitutional studies at the Cato Institute. He filed briefs supporting the challenge to DAPA on behalf of Cato and others who generally support immigration reform. Like most immigrants, he does a job native-born Americans won’t: defending the Constitution.
Amanda Frost is a Professor of Law at American University, where she specializes in constitutional law, immigration law, civil procedure, and the federal court system and federal jurisdiction.
Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia is the Samuel Weiss Faculty Scholar and founding director of the Center for Immigrants’ Rights Clinic at Penn State Law- University Park.
Cecillia Wang is Director of the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project. Today the Supreme Court announced that it was deadlocked four to four on United States v. Texas.
Gabriel J. Chin is Martin Luther King Jr. Professor of Law at UC Davis School of Law. As is customary, the Court’s per curiam affirmance of the Fifth Circuit by an equally divided court was a one-line opinion.