Skip to main content

Harris v. Quinn symposium

7 articles

Harris v. Quinn Symposium: Court departs from federalism, First Amendment jurisprudence

Catherine Fisk is the Chancellor’s Professor of Law at University of California Irvine School of Law. In Harris v. Quinn, the Court struck down an Illinois law authorizing the state to agree with the SEIU, the union that represents government-paid home care workers, that the workers must pay their fair share of the cost of the legal services that the SEIU is required by law to provide.

ByCatherine Fisk/Jul 3, 2014

Harris v. Quinn Symposium: The coming conflict in public employee speech law and the immediate risks to people with disabilities

What most people will take away from Harris v. Quinn is what the Court did not decide. Although the petitioners asked the Court to overrule its 1977 decision in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education and, effectively, make right-to-work laws constitutionally required in all public sector employment, the Court chose not to take so drastic a step.

BySamuel Bagenstos/Jul 1, 2014

Welcome to SCOTUSblog

Tell us a bit about yourself so we can tailor what you see. You can update these any time in your account.