Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt
Holding
Two provisions in a Texas law "requiring physicians who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital and requiring abortion clinics in the state to have facilities comparable to an ambulatory surgical center" place a substantial obstacle in the path of women seeking an abortion, constitute an undue burden on abortion access, and therefore violate the Constitution.
Judgment
Reversed and remanded, 5-3, in an opinion by Stephen G. Breyer on Jun 27, 2016. Justice Ginsburg filed a concurring opinion. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Thomas joined.
Recommended Citation: Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/whole-womans-health-v-cole/