Unicolors, Inc v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, LP
Holding
Lack of either factual or legal knowledge can excuse an inaccuracy in a copyright registration under 17 U.S.C. § 411(b)(1)(A)'s safe harbor.
Judgment
Vacated and Remanded, 6-3, in an opinion by Stephen G. Breyer on Feb 24, 2022. Justice Thomas filed a dissent, in which Justice Alito joined, and Justice Gorsuch joined as to all but Part II.
Jan 4, 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 8, 2021)Jan 19, 2021Waiver of right of respondent H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., et al. to respond filed.
Jan 27, 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
Feb 9, 2021Response Requested. (Due March 11, 2021)
Mar 4, 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 11, 2021 to April 1, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.Mar 5, 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 1, 2021.
Mar 11, 2021Brief amici curiae of American Society of Media Photographers and California Society of Entertainment Lawyers filed.Apr 1, 2021Brief of respondents H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., et al. in opposition filed.Apr 12, 2021Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from April 21, 2021 to May 4, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.Apr 13, 2021Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until May 4, 2021 granted.
May 3, 2021Reply of petitioner Unicolors, Inc. filed. (Distributed)May 4, 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
May 24, 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021.
Jun 1, 2021Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
Jun 25, 2021Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.Jul 12, 2021Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 3, 2021. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 21, 2021.
Jul 13, 2021Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Unicolors, Inc.Jul 19, 2021Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., et al.Aug 3, 2021Brief of petitioner Unicolors, Inc. filed.Aug 3, 2021Joint appendix filed. (Statement of cost filed)Aug 10, 2021Brief amicus curiae of Copyright Alliance filed.Aug 10, 2021Brief amicus curiae of The Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago in support of neither party filed.Aug 10, 2021Brief amici curiae of American Society of Media Photographers and California Society of Entertainment Lawyers filed.Aug 10, 2021Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association filed.Aug 10, 2021Brief amici curiae of Intellectual Property Law Professors filed.Aug 10, 2021Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.Aug 16, 2021ARGUMENT SET FOR Monday, November 8, 2021.
Sep 1, 2021Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.
Sep 21, 2021CIRCULATED
Sep 21, 2021Brief of respondents H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., et al. filed. (Distributed)Sep 22, 2021Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument filed.Sep 27, 2021Brief amicus curiae of New York Intellectual Property Law Association filed. (Distributed)Sep 28, 2021Brief amici curiae of Professors of Copyright Law filed. (Distributed)Sep 28, 2021Brief amici curiae of Center for Democracy & Technology and Electronic Frontier Foundation filed. (Distributed)Sep 28, 2021Brief amici curiae of Andrew D. Lockton and McHale & Slavin, P.A. filed. (Distributed)Sep 28, 2021Brief amici curiae of California Fashion Association filed. (Distributed)Sep 28, 2021Brief amicus curiae of Victoria Burke filed. (Distributed)Sep 28, 2021Amicus brief of National Retail Federation not accepted for filing. (Corrected version submitted) (October 04, 2021)
Sep 28, 2021Brief amicus curiae of National Retail Federation filed. (Distributed)Oct 12, 2021Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument GRANTED.
Oct 14, 2021The record from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.
Oct 14, 2021Reply of petitioner Unicolors, Inc. filed. (Distributed)Oct 18, 2021The time for oral argument is allotted as follows: 20 minutes for petitioner, 15 minutes for the Acting Solicitor General, and 35 minutes for respondent.
Nov 8, 2021Argued. For petitioner: E. Joshua Rosenkranz, New York, N. Y.; and Melissa N. Patterson, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: Peter K. Stris, Los Angeles, Cal.
Feb 24, 2022Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Breyer, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Alito, J., joined, and in which Gorsuch, J., joined, except as to Part II.
Mar 28, 2022JUDGMENT ISSUED.
Recommended Citation: Unicolors, Inc v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, LP, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/unicolors-inc-v-hm-hennes-mauritz-lp/