Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates, Inc.
Holding
(1) A litigant seeking to intervene as of right under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a)(2) must meet the requirements of Article III standing if the intervenor wishes to pursue relief not requested by a plaintiff; and (2) the court of appeals is to address on remand the question whether Laroe Estates seeks different relief than Steven Sherman: If Laroe wants only a money judgment of its own running directly against the town of Chester, then it seeks damages different from those sought by Sherman and must establish its own Article III standing in order to intervene.
Judgment
Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Samuel Alito on Jun 5, 2017.
Recommended Citation: Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates, Inc., SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/town-of-chester-v-laroe-estates-inc/