Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum
Holding
The presumption against the extraterritorial application of U.S. law applies to claims under the Alien Tort Statute, and nothing in the text, history, or purposes of the statute rebuts that presumption.
Judgment
Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by John Roberts on Apr 17, 2013. Justice Kennedy filed a concurring opinion. Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Thomas joined. Justice Breyer filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Justice Ginsburg, Justice Sotomayor, and Justice Kagan joined.
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. represents Achmed et al. and the Center for Justice and Accountability as”amici curiae“in support of the petitioners.
Holding: The presumption against the extraterritorial application of U.S. law applies to claims under the Alien Tort Statute, and nothing in the text, history, or purposes of the statute rebuts that presumption.
Judgment:”Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on April 17, 2013. Justice Kennedy filed a concurring opinion. Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Thomas joined. Justice Breyer filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Justice Ginsburg, Justice Sotomayor, and Justice Kagan joined.
Recommended Citation: Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/kiobel-v-royal-dutch-petroleum/