Woodcrest Homes Inc. v. Carousel Farms Metropolitan District
Petition for certiorari denied on March 23, 2020
Issue: Whether the Fifth Amendment"s restriction of eminent domain to "public use[s]" is satisfied even if a condemnation is undertaken "for the purpose of conferring a private benefit on a particular private party."
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petitions of the week (Andrew Hamm, February 20, 2020)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
08/12/2019 | Application (19A175) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 8, 2019 to November 7, 2019, submitted to Justice Sotomayor. |
08/16/2019 | Application (19A175) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until November 7, 2019. |
08/21/2019 | Blanket Consent of Woodcrest Homes, Inc. not accepted for filing. (September 05, 2019) |
11/07/2019 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 12, 2019) |
11/12/2019 | Consent to the filing of amicus briefs received from counsel for Woodcrest Homes, Inc. not accepted for filing. (November 13, 2019 -- Corrected version to be submitted) |
11/13/2019 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Woodcrest Homes, Inc. |
11/19/2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 12, 2019 to February 10, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
11/21/2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 10, 2020. |
12/10/2019 | Brief amici curiae of Southeastern Legal Foundation, et al. filed. |
02/10/2020 | Brief of respondent Carousel Farms Metropolitan District in opposition filed. |
02/24/2020 | Reply of petitioner Woodcrest Homes, Inc. filed. (Distributed) |
02/26/2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020. |
03/23/2020 | Petition DENIED. |