Wilkinson v. Portillo Martinez
Petition for certiorari denied on May 3, 2021
Issue: Whether the government must provide the written notice required to trigger the stop-time rule in a single document.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 09/25/2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 26, 2020) |
| 09/25/2020 | Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system. |
| 11/10/2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020. |
| 12/01/2020 | Response Requested. (Due December 31, 2020) |
| 12/16/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 31, 2020 to February 12, 2021, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 12/17/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 12, 2021. |
| 02/10/2021 | Brief of respondent Hector Emiliano Portillo Martinez in opposition filed. |
| 02/24/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021. |
| 04/29/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021. |
| 05/03/2021 | Petition DENIED. |