Washington v. Stenson
Petition for certiorari denied on October 9, 2012
Issue: Whether undisclosed evidence is material because of a possibility that it would have led counsel to further investigate the prosecution"s case for potential exculpatory evidence, when the defendant does not show that such an investigation would have uncovered evidence creating a reasonable probability of a different verdict in light of the record as a whole.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Ben Cheng, October 5, 2012)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 08/07/2012 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 10, 2012) |
| 09/07/2012 | Brief of respondent Darold Ray Stenson in opposition filed. |
| 09/07/2012 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Darold Ray Stenson. |
| 09/19/2012 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 5, 2012. |
| 09/19/2012 | Reply of petitioner Washington filed. (Distributed) |
| 10/09/2012 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. |
| 10/09/2012 | Petition DENIED. |
[##CERT-STAGE##]