Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. Lundgren
| Docket No. | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17-387 | Mar 21, 2018 | May 21, 2018 | 7-2 | Gorsuch | OT 2017 |
Holding: County of Yakima v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of Yakima Nation, 502 U. S. 251, addressed only a question of statutory interpretation of the Indian General Allotment Act of 1887, not the question whether Indian tribes have sovereign immunity in in rem lawsuits. The Lundgrens now ask the Supreme Court to affirm on an alternative, common-law ground: that the tribe cannot assert sovereign immunity because this suit relates to immovable property located in Washington state, purchased by the tribe in the same manner as a private individual. Because this alternative argument did not emerge until late in this case, the Washington Supreme Court should address it in the first instance.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 7-2, in an opinion by Justice Gorsuch on May 21, 2018. Chief Justice Roberts filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Kennedy joined. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Alito joined.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- OT2017 #26: "The Murder Zone" (First Mondays, May 29, 2018)
- A "view" from the courtroom: Strength in numbers (Corrected) (Mark Walsh, May 21, 2018)
- Opinion analysis: Justices reject state-court justification for limiting tribal immunity from state-court actions to adjudicate title to land (Ronald Mann, May 21, 2018)
- A "view" from the courtroom: Just another (snowy) workday here (Mark Walsh, March 21, 2018)
- Argument analysis: Justices dubious about tribal immunity from state-court actions to adjudicate title to land, but hesitant to embrace new theory (Ronald Mann, March 21, 2018)
- Argument preview: Justices to consider tribal immunity from state-court actions to adjudicate title to land (Ronald Mann, March 14, 2018)
- Justices release March calendar (Amy Howe, January 24, 2018)
- Court adds seven new cases to merits docket (Amy Howe, December 9, 2017)
- Petition of the day (Aurora Barnes, October 11, 2017)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 09/11/2017 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 13, 2017) |
| 10/13/2017 | Brief of respondents Sharline Lundgren and Ray Lundgren in opposition filed. |
| 10/27/2017 | Reply of petitioner Upper Skagit Indian Tribe filed. |
| 11/01/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/21/2017. |
| 11/17/2017 | Rescheduled. |
| 11/27/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2017. |
| 12/04/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2017. |
| 12/08/2017 | Petition GRANTED. |
| 01/22/2018 | Brief of petitioner Upper Skagit Indian Tribe filed. |
| 01/22/2018 | Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.) |
| 01/24/2018 | SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, March 21, 2018 |
| 01/29/2018 | Brief amici curiae of Cayuga Nation, Seneca Nation of Indians, Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe, Cherokee Nation, Pueblo of Pojoaque filed. |
| 01/29/2018 | Brief amici curiae of Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, Puyallup Tribe of Indians, and Skokomish Indian Tribe filed. |
| 01/29/2018 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. |
| 01/29/2018 | Brief amici curiae of States of Illinois, Indiana, New Mexico, and Texas filed in Support of Neither Party |
| 01/29/2018 | Brief amici curiae of National Congress of American Indians, et al. filed. |
| 02/07/2018 | CIRCULATED |
| 02/21/2018 | Record requested from the Supreme Court of Washington. |
| 02/21/2018 | Brief of respondents Sharline Lundgren and Ray Lundgren filed. (Distributed) |
| 02/28/2018 | Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed. |
| 02/28/2018 | Brief amicus curiae of Public Service Company of New Mexico filed. (Distributed) |
| 02/28/2018 | Brief amici curiae of Village of Union Springs, Town of Springport, Cayuga County filed. (Distributed) |
| 02/28/2018 | Brief amicus curiae of Seneca County, New York filed. (Distributed) |
| 03/12/2018 | Reply of petitioner Upper Skagit Indian Tribe filed. (Distributed) |
| 03/16/2018 | Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED. |
| 03/21/2018 | Argued. For petitioner: David S. Hawkins, Sedro-Woolley, Wash.; and Ann O’Connell, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Eric D. Miller, Seattle, Wash. |
| 05/21/2018 | Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Gorsuch, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Roberts, C. J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Kennedy, J., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Alito, J., joined. |
| 06/22/2018 | MANDATE ISSUED. |
| 06/22/2018 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |