United States v. Texas
Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
21-588 | 5th Cir. | Nov 1, 2021 | Dec 10, 2021 | N/A | Per Curiam | OT 2021 |
Holding: The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted and the application to vacate stay presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the court is denied.
Judgment: Dismissed as improvidently granted in a per curiam opinion on December 10, 2021. Justice Sotomayor dissents.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Court sends Texas abortion case back to 5th Circuit, rejecting challengers request to return case to district judge (Amy Howe, December 16, 2021)
- Court leaves Texas six-week abortion ban in effect and narrows abortion providers challenge (Amy Howe, December 10, 2021)
- Court seems inclined to let abortion providers pursue their challenge to Texas law (Amy Howe, November 1, 2021)
- Two cases. Three hours of arguments. Four sets of lawyers. Fifty mentions of abortion. One pair of red socks. (Mark Walsh, November 1, 2021)
- Supreme Court set to hear arguments in two challenges to Texas law that bans most abortions (Amy Howe, October 29, 2021)
- Supreme speed: The court puts abortion on the rocket docket (Mary Ziegler, October 25, 2021)
- Court wont block Texas abortion ban but fast-tracks cases for argument on Nov. 1 (Amy Howe, October 22, 2021)
- Texas tells justices to leave abortion plan in place, but suggests overruling Roe and Casey (Amy Howe, October 21, 2021)
- Biden administration asks justices to block enforcement of Texas abortion law (Amy Howe, October 18, 2021)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
10/18/2021 | Application (21A85) to vacate stay, submitted to Justice Alito. |
10/18/2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due November 22, 2021) |
10/18/2021 | Response to application (21A85) requested by Justice Alito, due Thursday, October 21, by noon ET. |
10/18/2021 | Motion for leave to file amici brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by Massachusetts, et al. |
10/18/2021 | Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services, et al. |
10/19/2021 | Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Administrative Law, Constitutional Law, and Civil Procedure Scholars. |
10/19/2021 | Motion for leave to file amici brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by Medical Organizations. |
10/19/2021 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Constitutional Accountability Center. |
10/19/2021 | Motion for leave to file amici curiae brief filed by Current and Former Prosecutors and Law Enforcement Leaders, et al. |
10/19/2021 | Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Legal Scholars Leah Litman, et al. |
10/20/2021 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Texas Medical Association. |
10/20/2021 | Motion for leave to file amici brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by Human Coalition, et al. |
10/21/2021 | Response to application from respondent Texas filed. |
10/21/2021 | Response to application from Erick Graham, et al. filed. |
10/21/2021 | Motion for leave to file amici brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by Indiana, et al. |
10/22/2021 | Reply of applicant United States filed. |
10/22/2021 | Application (21A85) referred to the Court. |
10/22/2021 | Consideration of the application (21A85) to vacate stay presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is deferred pending oral argument. The application is treated as a petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment (No. 21-588), and the petition is granted limited to the following question: May the United States bring suit in federal court and obtain injunctive or declaratory relief against the State, state court judges, state court clerks, other state officials, or all private parties to prohibit S.B. 8 from being enforced. The briefs of the parties in No. 21-588, limited to 13,000 words, are to be filed electronically on or before 5 p.m., Wednesday, October 27, 2021. Reply briefs, if any, limited to 6,000 words, are to be filed electronically on or before 5 p.m., Friday, October 29, 2021. Any amicus curiae briefs are to be filed electronically on or before 5 p.m., Wednesday, October 27, 2021. Booklet format briefs prepared in compliance with Rule 33.1 shall be submitted as soon as possible thereafter. The parties are not required to file a joint appendix. The case is set for oral argument on Monday, November 1, 2021. Justice Sotomayor, concurring in part and dissenting in part. (Detached opinion) |
10/22/2021 | ARGUMENT SET FOR Monday, November 1, 2021. |
10/23/2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Texas |
10/25/2021 | Motion for divided argument filed by respondents. |
10/25/2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, United States |
10/26/2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty filed (also in 21-463). VIDED. (Distributed) |
10/26/2021 | Brief amici curiae of Leading Medical Organizations filed (also in 21-463). VIDED. (Distributed) |
10/26/2021 | Motion for divided argument filed by respondents GRANTED. |
10/26/2021 | In lieu of filing separate briefs in both No. 21-463 and No. 21-588 (21A85), the state respondents may file a single opening brief, limited to 20,000 words, and a single reply brief, limited to 9,000 words. (Also in 21-463). |
10/27/2021 | Brief of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed) |
10/27/2021 | Consolidated brief of state respondents filed (also in 21-463). VIDED. (Distributed) |
10/27/2021 | Brief of private respondents filed. (Distributed) |
10/27/2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed. (Distributed) |
10/27/2021 | Brief amicus curiae of American Bar Association filed. (Distributed) |
10/27/2021 | Brief amici curiae of Legal Scholars filed (also in 21-463). VIDED. (Distributed) |
10/27/2021 | Brief amici curiae of Massachusetts, et al. filed (also in 21-463). VIDED. (Distributed) |
10/27/2021 | Brief amici curiae of Legal Scholars Leah Litman, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
10/27/2021 | Amicus brief of Texas Medical Association not accepted for filing. (October 27, 2021--brief needs correction) |
10/27/2021 | Amicus brief of Texas Medical Association not accepted for filing. (October 27, 2021--brief needs correction) |
10/27/2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Texas Medical Association filed. (Distributed) |
10/27/2021 | Brief amici curiae of Indiana, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
10/27/2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Blanca Telephone Company in support of neither party filed. (Distributed) |
10/27/2021 | Brief amici curiae of Local Governments filed (also in 21-463). VIDED. (Distributed) |
10/27/2021 | Brief amici curiae of 410 Texas Women Injured By Abortion, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
10/27/2021 | Brief amicus curiae of David Boyle filed. (Distributed) |
10/27/2021 | Brief amicus curiae of American Center for Law and Justice filed (also in 21-463). VIDED. (Distributed) |
10/27/2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Life Legal Defense Foundation filed (also in 21-463). VIDED. (Distributed) |
10/27/2021 | Brief amici curiae of Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
10/27/2021 | Brief amici curiae of 128 Current and Former Prosecutors and Law Enforcement Leaders, et al. filed (also in 21-463). VIDED. (Distributed) |
10/27/2021 | Main document of The Rogers Group not accepted for filing. (October 29, 2021) |
10/27/2021 | Record on appeal available on PACER. The USDC, W. District of Texas - transcript of October 1, 2021 hearing electronically received. |
10/28/2021 | Amicus of The Rogers Group not accepted for filing. (October 29, 2021) |
10/29/2021 | Reply brief of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed) |
10/29/2021 | Consolidated reply brief of state respondents filed (also in 21-463). VIDED. (Distributed) |
10/29/2021 | Reply brief of private respondents filed. (Distributed) |
11/01/2021 | 21-588 (21A85) Argued. For petitioner: Elizabeth B. Prelogar, Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For state respondent: Judd E. Stone, II, Solicitor General, Austin, Tex. For private respondents: Jonathan F. Mitchell, Austin, Tex. |
12/10/2021 | The application to vacate stay presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied. Justice Sotomayor would grant the application to vacate stay in No. 21A85 and dissents from the dismissal of No. 21-588 as improvidently granted. |
12/10/2021 | Writ of certiorari DISMISSED as improvidently granted. Opinion per curiam. The application to vacate stay (21A85) presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied. Justice Sotomayor would grant the application to vacate stay in No. 21A85 and dissents from the dismissal of No. 21-588 as improvidently granted. |
01/11/2022 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |