United States v. Cano
Petition for certiorari denied on June 28, 2021
Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit erred in concluding that the scope of a search of an electronic device under the border-search exception to the Fourth Amendment"s warrant requirement is limited solely to digital contraband on the device itself, and cannot include evidence of physical smuggling or other border-related crimes.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Affirmative action at Harvard, border searches and pedestrian safety (Andrew Hamm, February 26, 2021)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 01/29/2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 1, 2021) |
| 02/24/2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 1, 2021 to March 31, 2021, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 02/25/2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 31, 2021. |
| 03/16/2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 31, 2021 to May 12, 2021, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 03/17/2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 12, 2021. |
| 05/12/2021 | Brief of respondent Miguel Angel Cano in opposition filed. |
| 05/12/2021 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Miguel Angel Cano. |
| 06/01/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021. |
| 06/01/2021 | Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed) |
| 06/15/2021 | Rescheduled. |
| 06/21/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021. |
| 06/28/2021 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. |
| 06/28/2021 | Petition DENIED. |