Ohio Adjutant General’s Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
21-1454 | 6th Cir. | Jan 9, 2023 | May 18, 2023 | 7-2 | Thomas | OT 2022 |
Holding: The Federal Labor Relations Authority had jurisdiction over this labor dispute because a state National Guard acts as a federal agency for purposes of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute when it hires and supervises dual-status technicians serving in their civilian role.
Judgment: Affirmed, 7-2, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on May 18, 2023. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Gorsuch joined.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Leaving "rare birds" alone (Michael C. Duff, May 19, 2023)
- If it ain't broke, don't fix it? Justices consider whether to alter the National Guard collective-bargaining landscape (Michael C. Duff, January 10, 2023)
- Justices will assess federal labor protections for National Guard technicians (Michael C. Duff, January 6, 2023)
- Seven mostly low-profile cases are slated for oral arguments in January (Amy Howe, November 10, 2022)
- Court agrees to hear nine new cases, including challenge to tech companies' immunity under Section 230 (Amy Howe, October 3, 2022)