Skip to content

Taylor v. United States

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
14-6166 Feb 23, 2016 May 1, 2025 7-1 Alito OT 2015

Holding: Because the Hobbs Act criminalizes robberies and attempted robberies that affect any commerce "over which the U.S. has jurisdiction," the prosecution in a Hobbs Act robbery case satisfies the act's commerce element if it shows that the defendant robbed or attempted to rob a drug dealer of drugs or drug proceeds.

Judgment: Affirmed, 7-1, in an opinion by Justice Alito on May 1, 2025. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
09/04/2014Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 9, 2014)
09/30/2014Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 10, 2014.
11/07/2014Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including December 10, 2014.
12/08/2014Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including January 9, 2015.
01/05/2015Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including February 17, 2015.
02/18/2015Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including March 19, 2015.
03/17/2015Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including April 20, 2015.
04/20/2015Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including May 20, 2015.
05/20/2015Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including June 3, 2015.
06/03/2015Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including July 6, 2015.
07/06/2015Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
07/23/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 28, 2015.
10/01/2015Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED.
11/12/2015The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including November 30, 2015.
11/12/2015The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including January 13, 2016.
11/30/2015Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)
11/30/2015Supplemental joint appendix volume filed.
11/30/2015Brief of petitioner David Anthony Taylor filed.
12/23/2015SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, February 23, 2016
01/04/2016Record requested from U.S.C.A. 4th Circuit.
01/08/2016Record recieved from the U.S.C.A. 4th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER, with the exception of a SEALED appendix Volume III, which is also electronic.
01/13/2016Brief of respondent United States filed.
01/15/2016CIRCULATED.
02/12/2016Reply of petitioner David Anthony Taylor filed. (Distributed)
02/23/2016Argued. For petitioner: Dennis E. Jones, Abingdon, Va. For respondent: Anthony A. Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
06/20/2016Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Alito, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion.
07/22/2016JUDGMENT ISSUED