Stirling v. Williams
Petition for certiorari denied on October 7, 2019
Issue: Whether a state court is objectively unreasonable, for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1), when it concludes that a capital defendant was not prejudiced by his counsel"s failure to introduce evidence that a federal habeas court concludes is a "double-edged sword" that might "indicate future dangerousness" and which counsel may well choose not to introduce in any further proceedings.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 05/28/2019 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 1, 2019) |
| 06/28/2019 | Brief of respondent Charles Christopher Williams in opposition filed. |
| 07/12/2019 | Reply of petitioners Bryan Stirling, et al. filed. |
| 07/17/2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019. |
| 10/07/2019 | Petition DENIED. |