Security University, LLC v. International Information Systems Security Certification Consortium, Inc.
Petition for certiorari denied on January 9, 2017
Issue: What the proper standard under the Lanham Act is for analyzing a defendant's nominative use of a plaintiff's trademark.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Kate Howard, October 20, 2016)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
08/01/2016 | Application (16A114) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 16, 2016 to September 15, 2016, submitted to Justice Ginsburg. |
08/02/2016 | Application (16A114) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until September 15, 2016. |
09/15/2016 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 19, 2016) |
10/12/2016 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 18, 2016. |
10/19/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of The International Trademark Association filed. |
11/18/2016 | Brief of respondent International Information Systems Security Certification Consortium, Inc. in opposition filed. |
12/05/2016 | Reply of petitioners Security University, LLC, et al. filed. |
12/07/2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 6, 2017. |
01/09/2017 | Petition DENIED. |