Schulman v. LexisNexis Risk and Information Analytics Group, Inc.

Petition for certiorari denied on October 3, 2016

Docket No.	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
15-1420	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	OT 2016

Issue: Whether, in a class action settlement providing injunctive relief not authorized by statute and releasing or impairing the money-damages claims of absent or objecting members, class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) and the denial of the right to opt out as to the damages claims violate Rule 23 or the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Petition of the day (Kate Howard, June 24, 2016)

Date	Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
03/15/2016	Application (15A955) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 3, 2016 to May 19, 2016, submitted to The Chief Justice.
03/16/2016	Application (15A955) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until May 19, 2016.
05/19/2016	Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 22, 2016)
06/16/2016	Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.
06/22/2016	Waiver of right of respondents LexisNexis Risk and Information Analytics Group, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
06/22/2016	Waiver of right of respondents Gregory Thomas Berry, Summer Darbonne; Rickey Millen; Shamoon Saeed' Arthur B. Hernandez; Erika Godfrey & Timothy Otten to respond filed.
07/06/2016	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2016.
07/21/2016	Response Requested . (Due August 22, 2016)
08/22/2016	Brief of respondent Gregory Thomas Berry in opposition filed.
08/22/2016	Brief of respondents LexisNexis Risk and Information Analytics Group, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
09/07/2016	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2016.
09/08/2016	Reply of petitioner Adam E. Schulman filed. (Distributed)
10/03/2016	Petition DENIED.