Ryan v. Schad
Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12-1084 | 9th Cir. | Not Argued | Jun 24, 2013 | TBD | Per Curiam | OT 2012 |
Holding: After a defendant was denied certiorari review by the Supreme Court, the Ninth Circuit abused its discretion by sua sponte construing the defendant"s earlier motion to stay a mandate as a motion to reconsider, and when it withheld its mandate.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded. in a per curiam opinion on June 24, 2013.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Details on today's order list: Summary reversal in Ryan v. Schad (Tejinder Singh, June 24, 2013)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
03/04/2013 | Application (12A857) to vacate the stay of execution entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, submitted to Justice Kennedy. |
03/04/2013 | Response to application from respondent Edward Harold Schad filed. |
03/05/2013 | Reply of applicant Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections filed. |
03/05/2013 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 4, 2013) |
03/05/2013 | Appendix of Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections filed. |
03/05/2013 | Supplemental response filed by respondent Edward Harold Schad. |
03/05/2013 | Application (12A857) referred to the Court. |
03/05/2013 | Application (12A857) denied by the Court. Justice Scalia and Justice Alito would grant the application to vacate the stay of execution. |
03/27/2013 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 8, 2013. |
05/08/2013 | Brief of respondent Edward Harold Schad in opposition filed. |
05/08/2013 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Edward Harold Schad. |
05/20/2013 | Reply of petitioner Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections filed. (Distributed) |
05/21/2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 6, 2013. |
06/10/2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 13, 2013. |
06/17/2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 20, 2013. |
06/17/2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 20, 2013. |
06/24/2013 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. |
06/24/2013 | Petition GRANTED. Judgment REVERSED, and case REMANDED. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion) |
07/19/2013 | Petition for Rehearing filed. |
08/08/2013 | DISTRIBUTED. |
08/30/2013 | Rehearing DENIED. |
08/30/2013 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |
Holding: After a defendant was denied certiorari review by the Supreme Court, the Ninth Circuit abused its discretion by sua sponte construing the defendant”s earlier motion to stay a mandate as a motion to reconsider, and when it withheld its mandate.
Judgment:”Reversed and remanded.“in a per curiam opinion on June 24, 2013.