Robertson v. Intratek Computer, Inc.
Petition for certiorari denied on May 16, 2022
Issue: (1) Whether mandatory compelled arbitration of claims under 41 U.S.C. § 4712 disrupts the administrative scheme set up by Congress to remedy and enforce violations of 41 U.S.C. § 4712; and (2) whether Congress intended to prohibit enforcement of mandatory employment arbitration agreements in 41 U.S.C. § 4712, even if the statute does not expressly refer to arbitration, when it (a) expressly provided for a federal trial in the remedy and enforcement section and (b) expressly prohibited waiver of any rights and remedies provided as a condition of employment. CVSG: 4/11/2022
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Court issues orders from long conference, but relists some high-profile cases (Amy Howe, October 5, 2021)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
03/01/2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 7, 2021) |
04/21/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021. |
05/03/2021 | Response Requested. (Due June 2, 2021) |
05/26/2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 2, 2021 to July 2, 2021, submitted to The Clerk. |
05/27/2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 2, 2021. |
07/02/2021 | Brief of respondent Intratek Computer, Incorporated in opposition filed. |
07/20/2021 | Reply of petitioner James W. Robertson, Sr. filed. (Distributed) |
07/21/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021. |
10/04/2021 | The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States. |
04/11/2022 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. |
04/22/2022 | Supplemental brief of petitioner James W. Robertson, Sr. filed. (Distributed) |
04/26/2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022. |
05/16/2022 | Petition DENIED. |