Skip to content

Robertson v. Intratek Computer, Inc.

Petition for certiorari denied on May 16, 2022

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
20-1229 5th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2021

Issue: (1) Whether mandatory compelled arbitration of claims under 41 U.S.C. § 4712 disrupts the administrative scheme set up by Congress to remedy and enforce violations of 41 U.S.C. § 4712; and (2) whether Congress intended to prohibit enforcement of mandatory employment arbitration agreements in 41 U.S.C. § 4712, even if the statute does not expressly refer to arbitration, when it (a) expressly provided for a federal trial in the remedy and enforcement section and (b) expressly prohibited waiver of any rights and remedies provided as a condition of employment. CVSG: 4/11/2022

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
03/01/2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 7, 2021)
04/21/2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
05/03/2021Response Requested. (Due June 2, 2021)
05/26/2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 2, 2021 to July 2, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
05/27/2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 2, 2021.
07/02/2021Brief of respondent Intratek Computer, Incorporated in opposition filed.
07/20/2021Reply of petitioner James W. Robertson, Sr. filed. (Distributed)
07/21/2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
10/04/2021The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
04/11/2022Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
04/22/2022Supplemental brief of petitioner James W. Robertson, Sr. filed. (Distributed)
04/26/2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
05/16/2022Petition DENIED.