Skip to content

Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Participating Employers

Docket No. Op. BelowArgument Opinion Vote Author Term
12-992 1st Cir. Dec 9, 2013 Jan 15, 2014 9-0 Kennedy OT 2013

Holding: A decision on the merits is a "final decision" even if the award or amount of attorney's fees remains to be determined.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Kennedy on January 15, 2014.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
11/30/2012Application (12A551) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 11, 2012 to February 8, 2013, submitted to Justice Breyer.
12/03/2012Application (12A551) granted by Justice Breyer extending the time to file until February 8, 2013.
02/08/2013Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 14, 2013)
02/21/2013Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 13, 2013.
05/13/2013Brief of respondents Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Participating Employers, et al. in opposition filed.
05/24/2013Reply of petitioner Ray Haluch Gravel Company, et al. filed.
05/28/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 13, 2013.
06/17/2013Petition GRANTED.
07/11/2013The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 28, 2013.
07/11/2013The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including October 23, 2013.
08/27/2013Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
08/27/2013Brief of petitioners Ray Haluch Gravel Company, et al. filed.
09/17/2013SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday December 9, 2013
09/17/2013CIRCULATED
10/02/2013Record from U.S.C.A. for 1st Circuit is electronic and is available on PACER.
10/03/2013Record from U.S.D.C. for District of Massachusetts is electronic and is availabe on PACER.
10/23/2013Brief of respondents Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Participating Employers, et al. filed. (Distributed)
11/22/2013Reply of petitioners Ray Haluch Gravel Company, et al. filed. (Distributed)
12/09/2013Argued. For petitioners: Dan Himmelfarb, Washington, D. C. For respondents: James A. Feldman, Washington, D. C.
01/15/2014Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
02/18/2014JUDGMENT ISSUED.

Issue: Whether a district court”s decision on the merits that leaves unresolved a request for contractual attorney”s fees is a “final decision” under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, which provides that courts of appeals have jurisdiction of appeals from final decisions of the district courts.