QinetiQ U.S. Holdings, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Petition for certiorari denied on October 2, 2017
Issue: Whether an Internal Revenue Service Notice of Deficiency, just like any other final agency action, is subject to the reasoned-explanation requirement of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706(2).
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Aurora Barnes, June 10, 2017)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 04/04/2017 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 4, 2017) |
| 04/19/2017 | Waiver of right of respondent Commissioner of Internal Revenue to respond filed. |
| 04/25/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 11, 2017. |
| 04/28/2017 | Response Requested. (Due May 30, 2017) |
| 05/24/2017 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including June 29, 2017. |
| 06/29/2017 | Brief of respondent Commissioner of Internal Revenue in opposition filed. |
| 07/18/2017 | Reply of petitioner QinetiQ U.S. Holdings, Inc. & Subsidiaries filed. |
| 07/19/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 25, 2017. |
| 10/02/2017 | Petition DENIED. |