Panasonic Corporation v. Samsung Electronics Co.
Petition for certiorari denied on January 20, 2015
Issue: Whether public standard-setting and patent-pool licensing agreements that long predate the Clayton Act's four-year limitations period may indefinitely be subjected to antitrust challenge based on the defendants' ongoing collection of royalties, where the plaintiff, a longtime licensee, delays filing suit to challenge those pre-limitations agreements until the market has come to depend upon the licensed technology.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Maureen Johnston, December 23, 2014)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
09/18/2014 | Application (14A312) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 28, 2014 to November 27, 2014, submitted to Justice Kennedy. |
09/23/2014 | Application (14A312) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until November 12, 2014. |
11/12/2014 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 15, 2014) |
12/15/2014 | Brief amicus curiae of Generic Pharmaceutical Association filed. |
12/15/2014 | Brief of respondent Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. in opposition filed. |
12/29/2014 | Reply of petitioners Panasonic Corporation, et al. filed. |
12/30/2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 16, 2015. |
01/20/2015 | Petition DENIED. |