Nacchio v. United States
Petition for certiorari denied on June 22, 2017
Issue: (1) Whether funds forfeited pursuant to a criminal conviction are deductible in cases in which such forfeited funds (in contrast with a simultaneously imposed punitive fine) are earmarked and used to compensate victims of the underlying criminal offense; and (2) whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's holding in this case that such forfeited funds are not deductible conflicts with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit's holding in Stephens v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit's holding in Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. v. United States.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Kate Howard, February 22, 2017)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
12/21/2016 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 23, 2017) |
01/18/2017 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including February 22, 2017. |
02/22/2017 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including March 24, 2017. |
03/22/2017 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including April 7, 2017. |
04/07/2017 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including April 14, 2017. |
04/14/2017 | Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. |
04/26/2017 | Reply of petitioners Joseph P. Nacchio, et al. filed. |
05/02/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 18, 2017. |
06/05/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 8, 2017. |
06/12/2017 | Petition DENIED. Justice Kagan and Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. |