Skip to content

Miller v. Inslee

Petition for certiorari denied on October 7, 2019

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
18-1492 N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2019

Issue: Whether Washington"s compelling nonmember providers to accept a private organization as their exclusive representative for dealing with the state over public policy is one of the "other contexts" in which the "significant impingement on associational freedoms" is not tolerated by the First Amendment.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
05/24/2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 28, 2019)
05/30/2019Waiver of right of respondents Jay Inslee; Cheryl Strange; David Schumacher to respond filed.
05/30/2019Waiver of right of respondent Service Employees International Union, Local 925 to respond filed.
06/04/2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
06/14/2019Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed.
06/18/2019Response Requested. (Due July 18, 2019)
06/25/2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 18, 2019 to August 27, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
06/26/2019Blanket Consent filed on behalf of Petitioner, and respondents.
07/02/2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 27, 2019, for all respondents.
07/16/2019Brief amici curiae of Buckeye Institute, et al., filed.
07/18/2019Brief amicus curiae of Goldwater Institute filed.
08/27/2019Brief of respondent Service Employees International Union, Local 925 in opposition filed.
08/27/2019Brief of respondents State of Washington in opposition filed.
09/10/2019Reply of petitioner Katherine Miller filed.
09/11/2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
10/07/2019Petition DENIED.