Michigan v. Clary
Petition for certiorari denied on February 24, 2014
Issue: Whether Doyle v. Ohio, which prohibits impeachment use of an accused"s silence after Miranda v. Arizona warnings, should be revisited and overruled.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 08/16/2013 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 1, 2013) |
| 10/03/2013 | Waiver of right of respondent Rayfield Clary to respond filed. |
| 10/16/2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 1, 2013. |
| 10/30/2013 | Response Requested . (Due November 29, 2013) |
| 11/18/2013 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 13, 2014. |
| 01/13/2014 | Brief of respondent Rayfield Clary in opposition filed. |
| 01/13/2014 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Rayfield Clary. |
| 01/29/2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 21, 2014. |
| 02/24/2014 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. |
| 02/24/2014 | Petition DENIED. |