Maryland v. Rogers
Petition for certiorari denied on January 11, 2021
Issue: Whether the Court of Appeals of Maryland departed from the Supreme Court"s decisions in Smith v. Doe and Apprendi v. New Jersey in holding, contrary to the decisions of numerous federal courts of appeals and state supreme courts, that sex offender registration constitutes "punishment" within the meaning of the Sixth and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution, and that, as a result, any fact necessary for placement on the sex offender registry, such as the victim"s age, must be determined beyond a reasonable doubt during the criminal proceeding, even if that fact is not an element of the criminal offense that is the basis for registration.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petitions of the week: Snapchat discipline, sex offender registration, deportation proceedings and more (Andrew Hamm, September 25, 2020)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
08/28/2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 2, 2020) |
09/25/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 2, 2020 to December 1, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
09/28/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 1, 2020. |
12/15/2020 | Waiver of Jimmie Rogers of right to respond not accepted for filing. (December 15, 2020) |
12/15/2020 | Waiver of right of respondent Jimmie Rogers to respond filed. |
12/16/2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021. |
01/11/2021 | Petition DENIED. |