Skip to content

Manzano v. Indiana

Petition for certiorari denied on June 1, 2015

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
14-631 Ind. Ct. App. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2014

Issue: Whether, when a criminal defendant seeks to vacate a guilty plea on the ground that defense counsel rendered ineffective assistance, in order to establish prejudice the defendant must show that but for counsel"s errors he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial (as this Court, all twelve federal circuits, and virtually all the states hold), or whether the defendant must also show that had he gone to trial he would have been acquitted (as the Indiana Supreme Court persists in holding).

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
11/21/2014Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 29, 2014)
12/31/2014Waiver of right of respondent Indiana to respond filed.
01/14/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 20, 2015.
01/23/2015Response Requested . (Due February 23, 2015)
02/23/2015Order extending time to file response to petition to and including March 25, 2015.
03/25/2015Brief of respondent Indiana in opposition filed.
04/03/2015Reply of petitioner Juan Manzano filed.
04/08/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 24, 2015.
04/27/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 1, 2015.
05/04/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 14, 2015.
05/04/2015Record Requested .
05/13/2015Record received from the Indiana Supreme Court (1 envelope).
05/18/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 21, 2015.
05/26/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 28, 2015.
06/01/2015Petition DENIED. Justice Sotomayor dissents.
07/15/2015Record from Indiana Supreme Court has been returned.