Skip to content

KBR, Incorporated v. Metzgar

Petition for certiorari denied on January 20, 2015

Linked with:

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
13-1241 4th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2014

Issue: (1) Whether the political question doctrine bars state-law tort claims against a battlefield support contractor operating in an active war zone when adjudication of those claims would necessarily require examining sensitive military judgments; (2) whether the Federal Tort Claim Act's "combatant-activities exception," 28 U.S.C. § 2680(j), preempts state-law tort claims against a battlefield support contractor that arise out of the U.S. military's combatant activities in a theater of combat; and (3) whether the doctrine of derivative sovereign immunity bars state-law tort claims against a private contractor performing delegated public functions where the government would be immune from suit if it performed the same functions. CVSG: 12/16/2014.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
04/11/2014Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 15, 2014)
04/14/2014Brief amici curiae of Associated General Contractors of America, et al. filed.
05/15/2014Brief of respondents Alan Metzgar, et al. in opposition filed.
05/27/2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 12, 2014.
05/27/2014Reply of petitioners KBR, Incorporated, et al filed. (Distributed)
06/16/2014The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
12/16/2014Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
12/30/2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 16, 2015.
12/30/2014Supplemental brief of petitioners KBR, Incorporated, et al filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
01/20/2015Petition DENIED.