Kaufman County, Texas v. Winzer
Petition for certiorari denied on June 8, 2020
Issue: (1) Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit panel majority erred in reversing Kaufman County"s summary judgment after concluding that Officer Matthew Hinds did not violate clearly established law; (2) whether the 5th Circuit panel majority improperly retained Kaufman County as a defendant by concluding that Hinds may have violated a constitutional right by evaluating his use of force from the perspective of the respondents; and (3) whether the 5th Circuit panel majority improperly second-guessed the reasonableness of Hinds" use of force without due regard to the circumstances he encountered.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petitions of the week (Andrew Hamm, January 31, 2020)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
01/16/2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 18, 2020) |
02/18/2020 | Waiver of right of respondent Eunice J. Winzer to respond filed. |
02/18/2020 | Brief amici curiae of Texas Association of Counties, Texas Municipal League, Texas Municipal League Intergovernmental Risk Pool, Mississippi Municipal Service Company, and National Association of Police Organization filed. |
03/25/2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020. |
03/31/2020 | Response Requested. (Due April 30, 2020) |
04/30/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 30, 2020 to May 5, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
05/01/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 5, 2020. |
05/05/2020 | Brief of respondent Eunice J. Winzer in opposition filed. |
05/19/2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020. |
06/08/2020 | Petition DENIED. |