Harris v. Cooper
Pending petition
Docket No. | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
16-166 | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD |
Issue: (1) Whether the district court erred in holding that a lack of discernible standards prevented it from striking down as a partisan gerrymander a districting plan when the plan"s architect freely admitted it was a partisan gerrymander designed to elect as many Republicans as mathematically possible; (2) whether the district court erred in holding that it could not, on the record before it, strike down a districting plan under the 14th Amendment when the plan was designed to secure "partisan advantage" for Republicans; and (3) whether the district court erred in holding that it could not, on the record before it, strike down a districting plan under the First Amendment when the plan was designed to impose burdens on Democratic voters because of their political beliefs. In addition, on May 26, the Supreme Court ordered the parties to brief the following issues: (1) Do the appellants have standing to challenge the remedial map as a partisan gerrymander? (2) Is the district court"s order denying the appellants" objections to the remedial map appealable under 28 U. S. C. " 1253?
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
08/03/2016 | Statement as to jurisdiction filed. (Response due September 6, 2016) |
09/02/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of OneVirginia2021: Virginians for Fair Redistricting filed. |
09/06/2016 | Motion to dismiss or affirm filed by appellees Patrick McCrory, Governor of North Carolina, et al. |
09/06/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law in support of neither party filed. |
09/19/2016 | Opposition to appellees, motion to dismiss or affirm by appellants David Harris, et al., filed. |
09/21/2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 7, 2016. |
05/22/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 25, 2017. |
05/26/2017 | The parties are directed to file letter briefs addressing the following questions: 1) Do the appellants have standing to challenge the remedial map as a partisan gerrymander? 2) Is the District Court’s order denying the appellants’ objections to the remedial map appealable under 28 U. S. C. §1253? The letter briefs are to be filed simultaneously with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before noon, Tuesday, June 6, 2017. |
05/30/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 1, 2017. |
06/05/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 8, 2017. |
06/06/2017 | Supplemental letter of appellants David Harris, et al., Appellants filed. (Distributed) |
06/06/2017 | Supplemental letter of appellee North Carolina State Board of Elections filed. (Distributed) |
06/12/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 15, 2017. |
06/18/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/21/2018. |
06/27/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/27/2018. |
06/28/2018 | Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. |
07/30/2018 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |