Skip to content

Hamm v. Smith

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
24-872 11th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD OT 2025

Issues: Whether and how courts may consider the cumulative effect of multiple IQ scores in assessing an Atkins claim.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
02/12/2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 17, 2025)
02/19/2025Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 17, 2025 to April 16, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
02/28/2025Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 16, 2025 (30-day extension of time).
03/17/2025Brief amici curiae of Idaho, et al. filed.
03/17/2025Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
04/16/2025Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Joseph Clifton Smith.
04/16/2025Brief of respondent Joseph Clifton Smith in opposition filed.
05/06/2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/22/2025.
05/06/2025Reply of petitioner John Q. Hamm, Commissioner, Alabama Dept. of Corrections filed. (Distributed)
05/27/2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/29/2025.
06/02/2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/5/2025.
06/06/2025Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
06/06/2025Petition GRANTED limited to the following question: Whether and how courts may consider the cumulative effect of multiple IQ scores in assessing an Atkins claim.
06/16/2025Motion of Commissioner, Alabama Dept. of Corrections for an extension of time submitted.