Skip to content

Hamm v. Smith

Petition for certiorari denied on May 15, 2023

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
22-580 N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2022

Issue: Whether, in an Eighth Amendment method-of-execution case, an alternative method of execution is feasible and readily implemented merely because the executing state has statutorily authorized the method.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
12/20/2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 23, 2023)
01/23/2023Brief of respondent Kenneth Eugene Smith in opposition filed.
02/06/2023Reply of petitioner John Q. Hamm, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections filed. (Distributed)
02/08/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/24/2023.
02/22/2023Rescheduled.
02/27/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/3/2023.
03/01/2023Rescheduled.
03/13/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
03/20/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
03/27/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
04/10/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
04/17/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
04/24/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
05/08/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
05/15/2023Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas, with whom Justice Alito joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)