Craig v. Krueger
Pending petition
Related to:
Issue: (1) Whether the 10th Circuit erred in denying qualified immunity to petitioners on the issue of excessive force without conducting an individualized qualified immunity analysis, but engaged, at least in part, in a “collective” qualified immunity analysis which considered the aggregate actions of multiple officers at the scene; and (2) whether, in denying qualified immunity, the 10th Circuit evaluated whether the right at issue was “clearly established” at an impermissibly high level of generality, contrary to Kisela v. Hughes, City & County of San Francisco v. Sheehan, and Ashcroft v. al-Kidd.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 11/20/2025 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 24, 2025) |
| 12/01/2025 | Waiver of right of respondent John Krueger, et al. to respond filed. |
| 12/03/2025 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026. |
| 12/09/2025 | Response Requested. (Due January 8, 2026) |
| 12/12/2025 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 8, 2026 to February 9, 2026, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 12/15/2025 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 9, 2026. |
| 02/09/2026 | Brief of respondents John Krueger, et al. in opposition filed. |
| 02/25/2026 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2026. |