Skip to content

Craig v. Krueger

Pending petition

Related to:

Docket No. Op. BelowArgument Opinion Vote Author Term
25-604 10th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Issue: (1) Whether the 10th Circuit erred in denying qualified immunity to petitioners on the issue of excessive force without conducting an individualized qualified immunity analysis, but engaged, at least in part, in a “collective” qualified immunity analysis which considered the aggregate actions of multiple officers at the scene; and (2) whether, in denying qualified immunity, the 10th Circuit evaluated whether the right at issue was “clearly established” at an impermissibly high level of generality, contrary to Kisela v. Hughes, City & County of San Francisco v. Sheehan, and Ashcroft v. al-Kidd.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
11/20/2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 24, 2025)
12/01/2025Waiver of right of respondent John Krueger, et al. to respond filed.
12/03/2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
12/09/2025Response Requested. (Due January 8, 2026)
12/12/2025Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 8, 2026 to February 9, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
12/15/2025Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 9, 2026.
02/09/2026Brief of respondents John Krueger, et al. in opposition filed.
02/25/2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2026.