Skip to content

China Agritech Inc. v. Resh

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
17-432 Mar 26, 2018 Jun 11, 2018 9-0 Ginsburg OT 2017

Holding: Upon denial of class certification, a putative class member may not, in lieu of promptly joining an existing suit or promptly filing an individual action, commence a class action anew beyond the time allowed by the applicable statute of limitations.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on June 11, 2018. Justice Sotomayor filed an opinion concurring in the judgment.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
09/21/2017Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 23, 2017)
10/12/2017Waiver of right of respondent Charles Law to respond filed.
10/23/2017Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al.
10/23/2017Brief of respondents William Schoenke, Heroca Holding, B.V. and Ninella Beheer, B.V. in opposition filed.
11/07/2017Reply of petitioner China Agritech, Inc. filed.
11/08/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2017.
12/04/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2017.
12/08/2017Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. GRANTED.
12/08/2017Petition GRANTED.
01/17/2018Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, China Agritech, Inc..
01/22/2018Brief of petitioner China Agritech, Inc. filed.
01/22/2018Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
01/24/2018SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, March 26, 2018
01/24/2018Blanket Consent filed by Respondents, William Schoenke, Heroca Holding, B.V. and Ninella Beheer, B.V..
01/26/2018Brief amicus curiae of DRI--The Voice of the Defense Bar filed.
01/29/2018Brief amici curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association filed.
01/29/2018Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.
01/29/2018Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.
02/07/2018CIRCULATED
02/21/2018Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.
02/21/2018Brief of respondents William Schoenke, Heroca Holding, B.V. and Ninella Beheer, B.V. filed. (Distributed)
02/21/2018Supplemental joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed) (Distributed)
02/27/2018Brief amici curiae of Plaintiffs in Post-Dukes Successor Class Actions filed. (Distributed)
02/28/2018Brief amicus curiae of Public Citizen, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
02/28/2018Brief amici curiae of AARP and AARP Foundation filed. (Distributed)
02/28/2018Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed. (Distributed)
02/28/2018Brief amici curiae of Retired Federal Judges filed. (Distributed)
02/28/2018Brief amici curiae of American Association for Justice, et al. filed. (Distributed)
02/28/2018Brief amicus curiae of National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems filed. (Distributed)
03/16/2018Reply of petitioner China Agritech, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
03/26/2018Argued. For petitioner: Seth A. Aronson, Los Angeles, Cal. For respondents: David C. Frederick, Washington, D. C.
06/11/2018Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Kagan, and Gorsuch, JJ., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment.
07/13/2018JUDGMENT ISSUED.