Skip to content

Burnside v. Walters

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
12-7892 6th Cir. Not Argued Jun 3, 2013 TBD TBD OT 2012

Issue: Whether the Sixth Circuit erred in holding " in conflict with all eleven other federal circuit courts of appeals " that the in forma pauperis statute, 28 U.S.C. " 1915(e)(2), prohibits indigent plaintiffs from amending their complaints.

Judgment: Vacated and remanded in light of LaFountain v. Harry on June 3, 2013.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
12/17/2012Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 22, 2013)
01/22/2013Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by American Friends Service Committee, et al.
02/07/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 22, 2013.
02/12/2013Response Requested . (Due March 14, 2013)
04/24/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 9, 2013.
05/13/2013Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by American Friends Service Committee, et al. GRANTED.
05/13/2013Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED.
05/22/2013Motion to remand filed by petitioner William David Burnside.
05/28/2013Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 30, 2013.
06/03/2013Motion to remand GRANTED.
06/03/2013Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of LaFountain v. Harry, No. 11-1496, 2013 WL 2221569 (CA6, May 22, 2013).
07/05/2013JUDGMENT ISSUED.