Brookhart v. Smith
Petition for certiorari denied on March 28, 2022
Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit violated 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)"s strictures in awarding habeas relief to the respondent, Kenneth Smith, based on its own reweighing of the evidence rather than deferring to the state court"s contrary view.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Blocked beachgoers and bankruptcy bills (Andrew Hamm, October 15, 2021)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 09/24/2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 28, 2021) |
| 11/16/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021. |
| 11/30/2021 | Response Requested. (Due December 30, 2021) |
| 12/14/2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 30, 2021 to January 29, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 12/16/2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 31, 2022. See Rule 30.1. |
| 01/24/2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 31, 2022 to February 21, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 01/25/2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 22, 2022. See Rule 30.1. |
| 02/22/2022 | Brief of respondent Kenneth Smith in opposition filed. |
| 03/09/2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022. |
| 03/09/2022 | Reply of petitioner Deanna Brookhart filed. (Distributed) |
| 03/28/2022 | Petition DENIED. |