|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-676||5th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should recalibrate or reverse the doctrine of qualified immunity.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 16 2019||Application (19A308) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 30, 2019 to October 30, 2019, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Sep 17 2019||Application (19A308) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until October 30, 2019.|
|Oct 17 2019||Application (19A308) to extend further the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 30, 2019 to November 27, 2019, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Oct 17 2019||Application (19A308) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until November 27, 2019.|
|Nov 22 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 26, 2019)|
|Dec 04 2019||Waiver of right of respondents Mari Robinson, et al. to respond filed.|
|Dec 11 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.|
|Dec 18 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Association of American Physicians and Surgeons filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 20 2019||Brief amici curiae of Cross-Ideological Groups Dedicated to Ensuring Official Accountability, Restoring the Public's Trust in Law Enforcement, and Promoting the Rule of Law filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 08 2020||Response Requested. (Due February 7, 2020)|
|Jan 14 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 7, 2020 to March 9, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 16 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 9, 2020.|
|Feb 24 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 9, 2020 to April 8, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Feb 26 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 8, 2020.|
|Apr 08 2020||Brief of respondents Mari Robinson, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Apr 20 2020||Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from April 22, 2020 to April 28, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 21 2020||Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari until April 28, 2020, granted.|
|Apr 27 2020||Reply of petitioners Joseph A. Zadeh, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 28 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.|
|May 13 2020||Rescheduled.|
|May 18 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.|
|May 22 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.|
|Jun 01 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.|
|Jun 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.|
|Jun 15 2020||Petition DENIED.|
🚨 LIVE NOW 🚨 5PM on IGTV #SimplePolitics join me & @AHoweBlogger editor / reporter for the @SCOTUSblog for a great conversation on the recent decisions by the Supreme Court. There is so much to talk about.
SimplePolitics with Kim Wehle - Special Guest Bill Kristol, Editor-At-Large, The Bulwark
Tonight on #SimplePolitics, Bill Kristol and I have an in-depth conversation about Impeachment, what‘s next for ...
ICYMI: We got Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s first majority opinion today.
SCOTUS rules against immigrant who has lived in the US without authorization for decades. The gov't sought to deport him based on a state misdemeanor conviction (he used a fake Social Security card to get a job). SCOTUS says 5-3 he's not eligible to seek protection from removal.
NEW: In Freedom of Information Act case, SCOTUS says federal government does not have to disclose documents that were produced as part of a rulemaking on "cooling water intake structures" under the Clean Water Act. The Sierra Club argued the docs should be disclosed under FOIA.
At 10:00 a.m. EST, the Supreme Court will hand down one or more opinions in argued cases.
We’ll be live blogging through it at 9:45 with @AHoweBlogger, Mark Walsh, and @jamesromoser.
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, March 4 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, March 4, as the court releases opinions from the 2020-21 term. This live ...
SCOTUS will hear oral argument at 10:00 a.m. EST about when claimants must raise claims in the administrative process – “exhausting” their administrative remedies. Read more from Ronald Mann.
It might sound exhausting! But we claim it might be fun.
Justices to weigh issue exhaustion for Social Security claimants - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in Carr v. Saul involves a surprisingly basic question of administrative law: when claimants ...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.