|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-404||1st Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether Massachusetts’ ban on the possession of firearms and ammunition magazines for lawful purposes unconstitutionally infringes the individual right to keep and bear arms under the Second Amendment.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 28 2019||Application (19A11) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 25, 2019 to September 23, 2019, submitted to Justice Breyer.|
|Jun 30 2019||Application (19A11) granted by Justice Breyer extending the time to file until September 23, 2019.|
|Sep 23 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 25, 2019)|
|Oct 22 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 25, 2019 to December 9, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 24 2019||Brief amici curiae of Cato Institute, et al. filed.|
|Oct 25 2019||Brief amici curiae of National Association of Chiefs of Police et al. filed.|
|Oct 25 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National African American Gun Association, Inc. filed.|
|Oct 25 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 9, 2019.|
|Oct 25 2019||Amicus brief of Ninety-Four Members of the United States House of Representatives not accepted for filing. (October 28, 2019 - corrected brief to be submitted)|
|Oct 25 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Shooting Sports Foundation filed.|
|Oct 25 2019||Brief amicus curiae of The National Rifle Association of America, Inc. filed.|
|Oct 25 2019||Brief amici curiae of Ninety-Four Members of the United States House of Representatives filed.|
|Oct 25 2019||Amicus brief of Commonwealth Second Amendment, Inc. not accepted for filing. (November 04, 2019)|
|Oct 30 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Commonwealth Second Amendment, Inc. filed.|
|Dec 06 2019||Brief of respondents Maura T. Healey, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Dec 20 2019||Reply of petitioners David Seth Worman, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.|
|Apr 27 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.|
|May 11 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.|
|May 18 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.|
|May 22 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.|
|Jun 01 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.|
|Jun 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.|
|Jun 15 2020||Petition DENIED.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.