|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-404||1st Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether Massachusetts’ ban on the possession of firearms and ammunition magazines for lawful purposes unconstitutionally infringes the individual right to keep and bear arms under the Second Amendment.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 28 2019||Application (19A11) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 25, 2019 to September 23, 2019, submitted to Justice Breyer.|
|Jun 30 2019||Application (19A11) granted by Justice Breyer extending the time to file until September 23, 2019.|
|Sep 23 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 25, 2019)|
|Oct 22 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 25, 2019 to December 9, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 24 2019||Brief amici curiae of Cato Institute, et al. filed.|
|Oct 25 2019||Brief amici curiae of National Association of Chiefs of Police et al. filed.|
|Oct 25 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National African American Gun Association, Inc. filed.|
|Oct 25 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 9, 2019.|
|Oct 25 2019||Amicus brief of Ninety-Four Members of the United States House of Representatives not accepted for filing. (October 28, 2019 - corrected brief to be submitted)|
|Oct 25 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Shooting Sports Foundation filed.|
|Oct 25 2019||Brief amicus curiae of The National Rifle Association of America, Inc. filed.|
|Oct 25 2019||Brief amici curiae of Ninety-Four Members of the United States House of Representatives filed.|
|Oct 25 2019||Amicus brief of Commonwealth Second Amendment, Inc. not accepted for filing. (November 04, 2019)|
|Oct 30 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Commonwealth Second Amendment, Inc. filed.|
|Dec 06 2019||Brief of respondents Maura T. Healey, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Dec 20 2019||Reply of petitioners David Seth Worman, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.|
|Apr 27 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.|
|May 11 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.|
|May 18 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.|
|May 22 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.|
|Jun 01 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.|
|Jun 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.|
|Jun 15 2020||Petition DENIED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.