|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-6891||Okla. Crim. App.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2018|
Issues: (1) Whether a complex statistical study that indicates a risk that racial considerations enter into Oklahoma’s capital-sentencing determinations proves that the petitioner’s death sentence is unconstitutional under the Sixth, Eighth and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution; and (2) whether Oklahoma’s capital post-conviction statute, Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 22 § 1089(D)(8)(b), and the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals’ application of the statute in this case, denies the petitioner an adequate corrective process for the hearing and determination of his newly available federal constitutional claim in violation of his rights under the 14th Amendment’s due process and equal protection clauses.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 27 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 29, 2017)|
|Dec 21 2017||Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 29, 2017 to January 28, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Dec 27 2017||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 29, 2018.|
|Jan 29 2018||Brief of respondent State Of Oklahoma in opposition filed.|
|Feb 12 2018||Reply of petitioner Tremane Wood filed.|
|Feb 15 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/2/2018.|
|Feb 27 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Mar 12 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/16/2018.|
|Mar 13 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Mar 19 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/23/2018.|
|Mar 20 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Mar 26 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2018.|
|Mar 27 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Apr 09 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/13/2018.|
|Apr 10 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Apr 16 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/20/2018.|
|Apr 18 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Apr 23 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/27/2018.|
|Apr 27 2018||Rescheduled.|
|May 07 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/10/2018.|
|May 09 2018||Rescheduled.|
|May 14 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/17/2018.|
|May 21 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/24/2018.|
|May 23 2018||Rescheduled.|
|May 29 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/31/2018.|
|May 31 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Jun 04 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/7/2018.|
|Jun 06 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Jun 11 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/14/2018.|
|Jun 13 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Jun 18 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/21/2018.|
|Jun 19 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Sep 06 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.|
|Sep 11 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 01 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.|
|Oct 01 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 09 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.|
|Oct 09 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 22 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.|
|Oct 22 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 29 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.|
|Oct 29 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Nov 05 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018.|
|Nov 05 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Nov 13 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.|
|Nov 13 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Nov 26 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.|
|Nov 27 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Dec 03 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.|
|Dec 03 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Dec 20 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.|
|Jan 03 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Jan 07 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.|
|Jan 07 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Jan 14 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019.|
|Jan 22 2019||Petition DENIED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.