|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-532||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether provisions of California law that, with certain limited exceptions, prohibit state law-enforcement officials from providing federal immigration authorities with release dates and other information about individuals subject to federal immigration enforcement, and restrict the transfer of aliens in state custody to federal immigration custody, are preempted by federal law or barred by intergovernmental immunity.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 13 2019||Application (19A295) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 24, 2019 to October 24, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Sep 14 2019||Application (19A295) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until October 24, 2019.|
|Oct 22 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 22, 2019)|
|Nov 05 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 22, 2019 to December 23, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 07 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 23, 2019.|
|Nov 22 2019||Brief amici curiae of California Municipalities and Elected Officials filed.|
|Nov 22 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Sheriffs' Association filed.|
|Nov 22 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Southeastern Legal Foundation filed.|
|Dec 19 2019||Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition under Rule 15.5 filed.|
|Dec 20 2019||Brief of respondents State of California, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Dec 23 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.|
|Jan 02 2020||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 13 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2020.|
|Mar 03 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.|
|Mar 16 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.|
|Mar 23 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.|
|Mar 30 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.|
|Apr 13 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.|
|Apr 20 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.|
|Apr 27 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.|
|May 11 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.|
|May 18 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.|
|May 22 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.|
|Jun 01 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.|
|Jun 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.|
|Jun 15 2020||Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas and Justice Alito would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari.|
JUST IN: The Supreme Court agrees to take up five new cases, including an appeal from a high school football coach who lost his job after he prayed on the field.
#SCOTUS will have more opinions next Thursday at 10 am.
A workplace vaccine-or-test requirement that would have covered 84 million workers -- blocked. A vaccine mandate for over 10 million health care workers -- allowed to take effect.
Full analysis from @AHoweBlogger on this afternoon's rulings:
Fractured court blocks vaccine-or-test requirement for large workplaces but green-lights vaccine mandate for health care workers - SCOTUSblog
With COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations reaching a new record high as a result of the Omicron variant, the Suprem...
Here's a two-minute explainer from @katieleebarlow, SCOTUSblog's TikTokker-in-residence, on the pair of vaccine decisions the court just handed down.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court BLOCKS the federal government's COVID-19 vaccine-or-test requirement for large workplaces. The court ALLOWS a vaccine mandate for workers at federally funded health care facilities to take effect nationwide.
SCOTUS releases just one opinion today: an 8-1 decision on an arcane question of pension payments for "dual-status military technicians." The court rules in favor of the government's statutory interpretation and against the technicians. Barrett has the opinion; Gorsuch dissents.