|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-532||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether provisions of California law that, with certain limited exceptions, prohibit state law-enforcement officials from providing federal immigration authorities with release dates and other information about individuals subject to federal immigration enforcement, and restrict the transfer of aliens in state custody to federal immigration custody, are preempted by federal law or barred by intergovernmental immunity.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 13 2019||Application (19A295) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 24, 2019 to October 24, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Sep 14 2019||Application (19A295) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until October 24, 2019.|
|Oct 22 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 22, 2019)|
|Nov 05 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 22, 2019 to December 23, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 07 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 23, 2019.|
|Nov 22 2019||Brief amici curiae of California Municipalities and Elected Officials filed.|
|Nov 22 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Sheriffs' Association filed.|
|Nov 22 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Southeastern Legal Foundation filed.|
|Dec 19 2019||Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition under Rule 15.5 filed.|
|Dec 20 2019||Brief of respondents State of California, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Dec 23 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.|
|Jan 02 2020||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 13 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2020.|
|Mar 03 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.|
|Mar 16 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.|
|Mar 23 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.|
|Mar 30 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.|
|Apr 13 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.|
|Apr 20 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.|
|Apr 27 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.|
|May 11 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.|
|May 18 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.|
|May 22 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.|
|Jun 01 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.|
|Jun 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.|
|Jun 15 2020||Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas and Justice Alito would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.