|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-841||5th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2020|
Issues: (1) Whether the individual and state plaintiffs (the respondents here) possess Article III standing to challenge the constitutionality of Section 5000A(a) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA); (2) whether Section 5000A, as amended, exceeds Congress’ constitutional authority; and (3) whether, if Section 5000A is invalid, the provision is severable from the remainder of the act.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 03 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 3, 2020)|
|Jan 03 2020||Motion to expedite consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari filed by petitioner.|
|Jan 06 2020||Response to motion requested. (Due January 10, 2020, by 4 p.m.)|
|Jan 09 2020||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, United States House of Representatives.|
|Jan 10 2020||Response to motion from Federal respondents filed.|
|Jan 10 2020||Response to motion from State respondents filed.|
|Jan 10 2020||Response to motion from respondent Neill Hurley and John Nantz submitted.|
|Jan 13 2020||Reply in support of motion filed.|
|Jan 15 2020||Brief amicus curiae of AARP, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Jan 15 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Small Business Majority Foundation filed. VIDED.|
|Jan 15 2020||Brief amicus curiae of American Cancer Society et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Jan 15 2020||Brief amicus curiae of National Hospital Associations filed. VIDED.|
|Jan 15 2020||Brief amicus curiae of America's Health Insurance Plans filed. VIDED.|
|Jan 15 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Bipartisan Economic Scholars filed. VIDED.|
|Jan 17 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Jeremy C. Doerre filed. VIDED.|
|Jan 21 2020||Motion to expedite consideration filed by petitioner DENIED.|
|Jan 21 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 3, 2020 to March 17, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 22 2020||Response to motion from petitioner United States House of Representatives filed.|
|Jan 24 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response to the petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.|
|Jan 31 2020||Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed.|
|Feb 03 2020||Brief of State of Texas, et al. in opposition not accepted for filing. (February 03, 2020 -- Corrected version to be submitted)|
|Feb 03 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Association of American Physicians and Surgeons filed. VIDED.|
|Feb 03 2020||Brief of respondents United States, et al. in opposition filed. VIDED.|
|Feb 03 2020||Waiver of right of respondent State of California to respond filed.|
|Feb 03 2020||Brief of respondents State of Texas, et al. in opposition filed. VIDED.(February 3, 2020)|
|Feb 03 2020||Brief of respondents Neill Hurley and John Nantz in opposition filed. VIDED.|
|Feb 05 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.|
|Feb 12 2020||Reply of petitioner United States House of Representatives filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 18 2020||Letter of February 18, 2020 from counsel for petitioner filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 19 2020||Letter of February 19, 2020 from counsel for respondent State of California filed.|
|Feb 24 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.|
|Jun 21 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.|
|Jun 28 2021||Petition DENIED.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...